Mistake to treat Labor and Liberal the same

JULIA GILLARD’s disastrous election campaign showed that Labor’s lurch to the right is continuing. But it is a mistake to condemn both Labor and Liberal as just as bad as each other, as many on the left did during the election campaign.

The Greens and the left need to come out clearly to say we support a Labor government over a Tony Abbott government.

This is not because we should expect Labor’s policies to be any better—or because it is some kind of “lesser evil”. It is about relating to the mass of working class people who continue to support the party—and understanding the impact a Liberal victory will have on workers’ confidence to struggle.

Those who have already broken with Labor to support The Greens or who are active in campaigns like those to stop the Intervention and for refugee rights rightly feel betrayed by Labor’s performance in government. There is a temptation to brand both Labor and Liberal as just as bad as each other. The Greens often denounce both “the big parties” equally.

But the Labor and Liberal parties are not the same.

The Liberals are the open party of big business. Many Liberal MPs come direct from careers in the corporate world. Joe Hockey worked in banking and finance law; Malcolm Turnbull is a millionaire investment banker. A study of 384 MPs at state and federal level in 1998-99 found that of 75 who identified their previous occupation as “businessperson”, 60 were members of the Liberal-National Coalition and only six of the Labor Party.

Liberal Party members are unashamedly right-wing—and often racists. Anti-Muslim comments led to the dumping of Liberal candidate David Barker in the seat of Chifley this election, and last election in the seat of Lindsay the Liberals were caught distributing fake anti-Muslim leaflets

Labor membership

Labor’s rank-and-file members and supporters are different. Most of them back the party because they see Labor as a vehicle for progressive change or because they fear the alternative of a Liberal government.

Tony Abbott represents a return to Howard’s ultra-conservative politics over workers’ rights, sexism and racism. The hatred of such openly right-wing policies is a sentiment the left should try to connect with, not simply dismiss.

Labor’s members and supporters are people the left has to try to win over. They can be drawn into joint campaigns alongside the left, as the experience of Labor for Refugees and recent campaigns against privatisation in NSW and Queensland demonstrate. Labor for Refugees carried motions to change Labor’s refugee policy at every state Labor conference and have been part of many pro-refugee demonstrations.

Every Labor branch except one in NSW carried motions against power privatisation and the Labor Premier was defeated on the issue on the floor of the NSW Labor conference.

The strong union support for the Labor Party is another factor that makes the party very different to the Liberals. Unions still control 50 per cent of the votes at party conferences. Unionists who are Labor Party members have spoken at and provided crucial support to scores of left demonstrations and events. Many rank-and-file members are unionists.

Labor’s membership and support base is in long-term decline. Party membership was around 45,000 members when the party split in 1955, and had declined to 40,000 in 2006, despite the population more than doubling. Labor’s “rusted on” vote has declined too. According to the ANU’s Australian Election Study only 20 per cent of voters described themselves as lifelong Labor voters in 2007, versus 32 per cent in 1969 and 38 per cent in 1987.

But Labor’s core support continues to be drawn from the working class, and the more unionised and “class conscious” sections of it in particular. The proportion of union members who vote Labor remained at 64 per cent between 1987 and 2004, despite Labor losing office and a further 8 per cent of union members voting Green (and likely giving Labor their second preference). Conversely, a study of 2007 voting data showed that the higher the percentage of managers in an electorate, the lower the Labor vote. The natural home of managers and the rich is the Liberal Party.

A victory for the Liberals also sends a message to activists in the unions and political workers that most people in society are right-wing and racist. This sets back their confidence about the possibilities of changing the world through mass struggle.

It is impossible to build political campaigns or a left with any social weight without relating to the people who continue to support the Labor party.

That’s why the left needs to make it clear we are against a Liberal victory, as the precondition for trying to win Labor supporters into campaigning alongside the left, or ultimately to socialist politics.

By James Supple

Follow us

Magazine

Solidarity meetings

Latest articles

Read more

Torrens Transit drivers get on board to win

Adelaide bus drivers struck on 9 January, picketing depots and bringing most public buses to a standstill.

Frustration at Dan Andrews but voters won’t back the Liberals

Victoria’s election delivered humiliation for the Liberals and ended with Labor’s Daniel Andrews comfortably re-elected for the third time.

Dan Andrews—progressive sheen covering a law and order agenda

Victoria’s claim to be “the most progressive state in the nation” leaves out some inconvenient facts.

Comments

  1. The arguments put by James Supple have merit but don’t deal with reality. Federal Labor is as much a captive of big business as the Conservative Coalition is. After all the work unionists put in to Labor winning Government in 2007, and again in 2010, what have we got to show for it?

    Asylum seekers are suffering the same inhumane treatment as they did under the fascist Howard government. It was Big Kim who jumped into the boat with Howard for children overboard. Mining companies determine what tax they will pay, education and welfare are subject to cuts to deliver a surplus to stay on the (literally) right side of rating agencies who lost all credibility in the GFC. And we still have the star chamber Australian Building and Construction Commission. Add to that the USA, the rapers and pillagers of tue deomcocracy, have been given an open invitation to our shores and any other part of it that they want to occupy. I would never vote for the Liberals or any other conservative party, but I can’t vote Labor any more. We need a new party, and the Greens are the best option at the moment, along with the thinking independents (which rules out Bob Mad Hatter). The book on Percy Brookfield (covered in this edition) should be mandatory reading for all Labor politicians, particularly thos who have entered Parliament from a union background.

  2. So how many comment since August 2010? Just one. Some Solidarity. Solidarity is dead. Most Australians are right wing and rascist, and are capitalistsand share holders etc. From my perspective of voting since 1977 is that it has been a waste of time. Hawk didn’t live up to his potential, Keating was a bastard. But Labour these days (note how it should be spelt) don’t know what they stand for and if they did know don’t have the balls to carry it through. The Labour Party is is finished. The only party that actually says the right things. The things I foolishly expect the Labour Party to say is The Greens.
    I’ll never vote Labour again.

  3. Frank you’ve certainly got some valid points. And you’re certainly correct that most people here are racist & ethnocentric. Certainly those two ghastly traits! Have been since the 1950’s in fact!
    But I actually think upon studying things closer they’re more than right-wing. I think they’re actually brazen far-rightists which is even worse. Because that’s not even based upon reason & rationality (as is Liberalism or Socialism). It’s based upon romantic hogwash. Im a keen student of Sociology.

  4. It’s just not true that most Australians are right-wing. Why else is there such disillusionment with Labor’s failure to change anything since their election in 2007–seen in the fall of Kevin Rudd and their current dismal poll ratings?

    Social attitudes surveys have consistently shown that a majority of people are against the neo-liberal agenda of privatisation, wage cutting and cuts to public services. Over issues like immigration public opinion is more right-wing: but that is precisely who governments try to use it to deflect attention from their unpopular economic policies.

    For instance “When Howard took power, 17 per cent preferred increased social spending to tax cuts. Nine years later it was 47 per cent, according to the country’s largest survey of social attitudes. Support for privatisation plummeted: from 30 per cent support for privatising Telstra to 9 per cent. Those who thought big business had too much power rose to 62 per cent.”
    See our article http://localhost/solidarity.net.au/26/how-did-rudd-go-wrong-so-fast/

  5. I’m sorry James I think you’re wrong & Frank & Dennis are right. As sad & tragic as it is to admit I think what they say is true. Why is it in the year ‘2011’ (the supposed Space Age) there still hobbles here a significant 19th Century mentality? I was on a bus last year in Penshurst, NSW, & witnessed a disgusting tirade of racism/ethnocentrism from one woman. So much for ‘progress down-under’

  6. James, a big part of the problem is ‘nationalism’ & with it, Alan Jones & Andrew Bolt. They ‘ramble on’ about ‘prosperity’ (of the material kind) but let’s see if they get into Heaven after they pass. I dont recall God ever saying anything about ‘money’ or ‘Earthly possessions’ as the ticket to entry.

  7. James, all I can say now is that the Hon. Mr Ted Wheelwright has been vindicated & is a prophet. He prophesised all this back in ‘1990’ but sadly I was still in school then. May he rest in peace.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here