1949 coal strike: How Chifley lost Labor’s supporters

For decades, only the Left has talked about the 1949 coal miners’ strike, using it as an example of how low a Labor government can stoop—to the point of using soldiers to scab.

So it should have been welcome news that the ABC had put resources into an hour-long dramatisation, Infamous Victory: Ben Chifley’s Battle For Coal.The ABC's Infamous Victory tries to justify Labor Prime Minister Ben Chifley's war on the miners' union.

Unfortunately, the ABC has given us little to cheer about, creating a show that turns the ideological tables to paint Labor as the embattled victim of a Cold War plot.

The years immediately following the Second World War were pregnant with radical possibilities.

Worldwide, millions had died, tens of millions more were wounded or displaced. Europe was in tatters. Workers on the home front had been cajoled or coerced into heroic feats of production.

These were the same workers who had suffered enormous privations in peacetime—in the Depression that preceded the conflict.

Australia was no exception. Unemployment peaked at about 30 per cent in the 1930s. Some 40,000 Australians died in the war and those at home were made to sacrifice, through rationing of essential goods and inflation.

The mood in 1945 was that it was time for workers to get their reward.

The first to gain from this was Labor under Ben Chifley, returned with 51.3 per cent of the first preference vote in the 1946 election—its best ever result. It held 33 of 36 senate seats.

But workers quickly found that improvements would still have to be fought for.

Chifley opposed calls for wage increases to compensate for wartime sacrifice. Unionists responded with strike action—four million days in 1945-46 alone—and won substantial gains.

Labor’s obstruction continued over the move to a 40-hour week. Again it was mass action that tipped the balance. The Arbitration Court, in granting the claim from January 1948, declared:

“This working class claim has been and is the basis of industrial dispute and unrest … No realist for a minute think that a rejection by the Court in these cases would bring about industrial harmony and would abate for an instant the demand for the shorter week.”

The 40-hour week raised the question of a five-day week with penalty rates for weekend working. Railway workers led the charge in February 1948.

Once again they faced resistance from Labor. Queensland premier Hanlon banned picketing. Police baton-charged a demonstration, injuring several people.

Central to this union struggle was the Communist Party, which emerged from the war (in which Russia had been an ally of the West) at the peak of its success.

It had 23,000 members, an MP in the Queensland parliament, control of some local councils and, crucially, the support of between 25 and 40 per cent of unionists.

By 1948, many of its middle-class, wartime recruits had fallen away. But the party still had some 300 top-level trade union officials and control of key blue-collar unions.

In 1949, the CP leadership of the Miners Federation decided to launch a three-pronged claim, for a 35-hour week, long service leave and a 30-shilling ($3) a week pay rise.

Infamous Victory paints Chifley as a friend of the workers. He had taken part in the NSW general strike of 1917 as a train driver. It was he who coined the inspirational Labor slogan, the Light on the Hill, pointing the way to a better society.

The central theme of Infamous Victory is that the decent Chifley was forced to do the unthinkable, even at the risk of alienating Labor voters, by the CP.

According to the program, the dispute was imposed on the miners, concocted by the CP to produce a revolutionary situation.

This was the justification for Labor’s vicious attacks on the miners and their supporters, which included:

  • banning strike pay and solidarity donations;
  • jailing eight union officials;
  • a police raid on the CP’s Sydney headquarters; and
  • sending troops in to mine open-cut coal.

The truth was that the miners were overwhelmingly behind the strike. They had a proud and militant tradition to draw on.

Many of the older miners well remembered the death of Norman Brown—shot by the police on the picket line at Rothbury in NSW in 1929.

They also remembered that 1929 had been a lock-out by the employers and that the state had lined up with the bosses.

As one miner put it in the Newcastle Morning Herald in July 1949:

“I have no doubt that the conditions I enjoy today are the direct result of the struggle and hardships of the past …

“We will continue to use our gifts in the only way we ever have found to get results – by struggle.”

Miners backed the claim and the call for a general strike by 7995 votes to 822.

Their union paper, Common Cause, reported that meetings were “among the best in the Federation’s history … with a higher attendance and better vote that those on the eve of the big 1940 general strike”.

A further blow to the Infamous Victory thesis was that the employers used deliberately provocative tactics in the run-up to the strike.

They not only rejected the pay claim and the 35-hour week, but called on the Federation to make four significant concessions in return for a watered-down long service leave clause.

In June, the Federation was poised to call mass meetings for action. When the head of the Coal Industry Tribunal indicated that the union’s claim would be “generously” considered, the leadership postponed the meetings for a fortnight.

Far from accepting this olive branch, the employers announced that they would oppose long service leave outright.

It was this, much more than any “Communist plot”, that tipped the balance towards striking.

The dispute was a turning point that shaped Australian politics for a generation.

On their side, the miners had the power that comes from stopping coal supplies in a society dependent on the stuff. Industry ground to a halt.

While the miners also enjoyed widespread solidarity, they found they were up against not just the employers, but the state.

Chifley deployed some new tactics, such as major advertisements in the papers putting the government’s case, as well as a dirty old one—convincing the rail union to scab.

Labor put itself on the line, with MPs going into the coalfields and into major workplaces to argue with the miners and their supporters head on.

The tone deteriorated. As Infamous Victory shows, the Minister for Immigration, Arthur Calwell told tens of thousands in the Sydney Domain that Communists should be put into concentration camps—just four years after the Holocaust. He continued:

“We will use all the resources of the country against them. We will use the army on them, the navy on them and the air force on them …

“Only the stars are neutral in this fight. This is a fight between the Labor movement and the Labor Government on the one hand and the Communist ratbags on the other. It is a fight that the Government must win …

“The army will be used in the open cuts. We will run up the Australian flag and it will cover Australian servicemen mining coal in Australia for the Australian people.”

In Infamous Victory, Chifley refers to “civil war” and a “semi-revolution”. It is this analysis that justifies his use of the state to drive the miners back to work.

By 1949, the Communist Party’s analysis was that a recession, even a Depression, was coming and that workers should grab what they could before the going got tougher.

The CP had also sharpened its anti-Labor rhetoric and was counterposing itself to the ALP in an increasingly shrill, ultraleft way.

But there is no indication that the Communist Party was planning for insurrection.

Far from bringing down capitalism, the outcome of the strike weakened the Left for a generation. The CP went into what turned out to be a long, irreversible decline.

Labor lost the December 1949 election. The strike was not the only reason—Chifley’s pledge to retain rationing in order to help Britain was also deeply unpopular.

The result was not only an even more rabidly anti-Communist government under Menzies, but the deepening of anti-Communism within the ALP, leading to the 1955 split.

The story of the 1949 strike is more than historical curiosity. It shows the depth of Labor’s loyalty to the system. It shows how Labor will fracture its base rather than threaten capitalism.

Sixty years on, it is inconceivable that a Labor minister would stand on a soap box and talk directly to striking workers.

But it is sadly all too believable, if the stability of the system demanded it, that today’s Labor would wield its biggest sticks against us.

The ghost of Chifley hovers over next month’s trial of CFMEU official Noel Washington and the possibility of his jailing.

By David Glanz

* In most respects, Infamous Victory sketches a broadly accurate picture of the course of events. But one element does not ring true.

With the strike under way, Chifley is shown offering to concede the full claim. He does this, according to the scriptwriters, knowing that the miners’ leaders would not be able to accept without undermining the Communist Party’s strategy for destabilisation.

Yet if the rank-and-file knew, it would foment a revolt against the strike.

The only evidence for this that I can find is a line by Phillip Deery in the Journal of Australian Studies, No. 54-55, 1997, republished here

Infamous Victory: Ben Chifley’s Battle For Coal
ABC1, November 6

Watch online at www.abc.net.au/tv/iview


Solidarity meetings

Latest articles

Read more

Labor conference endorses Albanese’s conservative agenda and military build-up

Anthony Albanese and Defence Minister Richard Marles staked their credibility on defeating dissent over AUKUS. It was not much of a gamble.

LA’s 1960s rebellion a guide to the fire next time

Contrary to the popular perception of Los Angeles as a youth paradise, with surfing and an “endless summer” of partying, LA in the 1960s was a hothouse of activism. The book Set the Night on Fire: L.A. in the Sixties by American Marxist Mike Davis and Jon Wiener is its history.

Sanctions: a double-edged weapon of imperialist war

Sanctions are a cruel weapon of war. But the imperialist powers that impose them can also face unintended consequences. David Glanz looks at a new book that explores the history of sanctions.


  1. Below is a letter sent to ABC television from Fluer Ellis, daughter of Edgar Ross. Edgar was the editor of ‘Common Cause’ and involved in the strike.

    re: Infamous Victory, Ben Chifley’s Battle for Coal, TV programme ABC1 6/11/08 8.30pm

    The ABC and Bob Ellis are obviously intrigued by the story of the 1949 Coal Strike – revisiting it once more with
    Chifley and the two Ross brothers as the main protagonists. First came, “The True Believers” and now “Infamous Victory, Ben Chifley’s Battle for Coal” 6/11/08.  With this second attempt / rehash, I would have expected more thorough research.

    Why are you still perpetuating the Myth that the Communists were responsible for the strike? This latest epic was advertised as docudrama. There was plenty of drama, but very little doco. Note – documentary means actual account. Not a complete fabrication of history.

    I do not know how well the Chifley and Mine owners side of the story was researched, but, as Edgar Ross’s daughter, I do know that those on the other side of the dispute were never interviewed.

    There was no discussion with Edgar Ross or any of his family.  There were no interviews with any of the people who had worked with him around this period.   I believe also that there were no discussions with the Miners
    leaders, or the Communists who were involved at that time.  To claim documentary status without exploring all the available facts, and interviewing  all those involved,  is not only incompetent, and biased, but also grossly misleading.

    I grew up listening to my parents discussions around the dining table – frequently about the mining industry – of the poor pay and working conditions of the miners, and of  the terrible accidents that occurred in this dangerous industry.  My maternal grandfather was crushed in a mine fall, barely surviving the  multiple fractures he received. Health and Safety issues did not seem to be a top priority.   To this day I cannot bring myself to enter a mine, even as a tourist.

    At the time of the Miners Strike, I was a  fifteen year old GIRL, (not the little boy I was portrayed as in the “True
    Believers”) and  I can clearly remember discussions  of how the workers awards and conditions were being threatened.  I well remember Edgars concern that the Union was not heeding the Communists advice to continue negotiations through arbitration.  They were worried about the possible damage that could be done to the union and workers should the strike go ahead.  In a last ditch attempt to prevent the strike my father went to the secretary of the Joint Coal Board to try and work out a back door deal.  He was informed that “Chif is determined to pull you on”.

    The decision to strike was taken by the Miners leaders with the overwhelming support of the membership. This decision having been made the Communists, other unions and organisations rallied in support of them. The N.S.W. Labor Council condemned the strike while reaffirming support for the mineworker’s claims.  The executive of the Labor Party in NSW followed suit.

    To infer that a struggle for a thirty hour week could lead to a Socialist revolution is ludicrous in the extreme.  It
    shows a total lack of knowledge of that period of history,  a pre-requisite, I would  have thought, for any serious documentary making.   Remember, as stated in your ‘docudrama’, the people of this Country  had only recently rejected,  by referendum, the Nationalisation of its banks.

    Edgar Ross was not an official of the Miners Union, but was employed by them for over thirty years as the editor
    of their paper the Common Cause.  As a measure of their respect he was also their representative on the NSW
    Labor Council.  A highly respected journalist he was also regarded as a brilliant orator.  He was a member of the
    Australian Journalists Association and upon  retirement was awarded an Honorary Life Membership.  It has been
    stated that Edgar could have walked into a lucrative career at any time in his life – I was aware of several such
    offers, however he was too committed to his Socialist ideals, and spent his lifetime supporting the rights and conditions of working people.

    The myth / lie that the Union Executive were told that all the miners demands would be met, and  then withheld
    that information from the members, is nothing short of libellous.  You are lucky that the main protagonists are no longer alive.

    It has always been difficult to get at the truth.  I have enormous respect for the handful of courageous journalists who do so.   For the rest, we the public, need to be forever vigilant, sceptical of all that we are fed by the media – especially that which purports to be history – always questioning – always challenging.

    Yours faithfully,
    Fleur Ellis

    Copy to  Mr Bob Ellis, Film Australia – Making History, Sydney Morning Herald, CFMEU

  2. Below is a copy of a letter I sent to the ABC after the screening of “Infamous Victory, Ben Chifley’s Battle for Coal”, TV programme ABC1 6/11/08 8.30pm. I have not received a reply although I requested one.

    I was 12 years old in 1949 and remember the Coal Strike quite well. My father was in the Communist Party and a member of the ARU (Australian Railway Union). By 1951 my sister and I were members of the Eureka Youth League and took part in a Youth Peace Carnival which began with a picnic at Hollywood Picnic Grounds near Casula during the summer months.

    I recognised footage of that picnic with girls in coloured skirts and white blouses marching in uncut grass carrying cardboard doves on sticks, portrayed as Communist Youth marching in support of the revolution.

    Your story stated that we could only use power for 2 hours per day and people were starving and cold. Not true. We had lots of blackouts, but in those days, just after the war, nobody had electric heaters. Wood fired stoves were more the order of the day. Even our local picture theatre, lovingly known as ‘The Bug House” had its own generators, so we didn’t even miss the Saturday Night Flicks.

    People who were out of work did suffer it is true, but those in work rallied around to help those laid off. My father held many street meetings where food and money was collected. I’m not sure if the goods were for miners or unemployed, but I know it must have been cabbage season because he often joked about the number he received – under the noses of the local police – so what was that about people being sent to gaol for helping the strikers?

    The letter from the Blacktown woman was read over footage of an inner city slum. She would have been living in the same type of housing as we were – a small fibro cottage on a quarter acre block.

    The programme failed to mention one of the main reasons for the strike. The mechanisation of the mines meant that the miners could no longer hear the mine “talking” to them, and their safety was at risk. I don’t profess to know about the Communist Party using this as an excuse for the revolution, but I seriously doubt it. My memories of the meetings and get togethers at our place just don’t fit with that scenario. Dad really believed in “the cause” but he and those around him knew we were far from that time. He wasn’t in the league of people such as Edgar Ross, and he was quite naive, so I am sure he wouldn’t have been in a position to know that detail.

    I do know that he would have been shattered if fellow ARU members “scabbed” in the manner portrayed last night. What I do have a vague memory of, though, is that this was the time of Catholic Action within the Labor Party and the beginning of the DLP. Perhaps Bob Ellis missed out a bigger story by failing to research this one properly.

    Yours faithfully,

    Alice Jansen


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here