Coronavirus spending—How can governments suddenly fund everything?

The scale of the government spending announced in recent weeks is staggering. Scott Morrison has revealed three huge spending packages totalling $320 billion.

Nor is Morrison alone. The US has agreed to spend $2.2 trillion, as part of a stimulus package thrashed out between Donald Trump and the US Congress. Globally over $13 trillion has already been committed—and more is on the way. So why are governments suddenly taking such dramatic action?

The answer is the scale of the economic collapse capitalism is facing. As Martin Wolf put it in the bosses’ Financial Times, “it is much the biggest crisis the world has confronted since the second world war and the biggest economic disaster since the Depression of the 1930s”.

Governments worldwide have imposed lockdowns in the hope of slowing the spread of the virus, forcing businesses to close and crippling whole economies.

Retail and hospitality businesses have folded due to loss of sales. Many airlines are also on the brink of collapse, and the knock-on effects are flowing through other industries. The IMF expects the Australian economy to contract by 6.7 per cent this year. The economy is facing a collapse faster than that during the Great Depression as huge swathes of industry come to a sudden halt.

Morrison’s aim is to save capitalism, through short term measures designed to keep businesses intact and allow them to make it to “the other side” of the pandemic. The hope is to save as many businesses as possible from going to the wall.

The state has often had to step in to play this role in an economic crisis. Central to the job of the state under contemporary capitalism is providing the conditions in which the free market can function.

So in the last economic crisis in 2008, the US spent $700 billion to bail out the banks when the financial system seemed on the verge of collapse.

In Australia, then Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd spent $75 billion on stimulus measures in order to prop up the economy and avoid a recession.

Another Keynesian moment

This involved using Keynesian methods of increasing government spending to generate demand for goods and services, pioneered by the economist John Maynard Keynes. Demand would otherwise have drastically shrunk as, in the private sector, companies collapsed and workers lost jobs and income.

The idea is that government intervention can reduce the scale of the economic slump, creating the conditions for renewed boom.

This is a challenge to the usual neo-liberal economic orthodoxy, which has dominated government and official policies since the late 1970s, involving a retreat from government intervention in the economy in favour of worship of the free market as the way to solve economic problems. Privatisation and cutbacks to government spending on health and education have been the order of the day.

Yet in the face of a developing economic collapse, the failure of governments to step in would only result in a deeper recession that would be even more damaging for capitalism. That is the lesson mainstream economists drew from the 1930s Depression, when wage cuts and government austerity only served to make the crisis worse.

The sums being spent now are enormous. The scale of government intervention shows the possibility of massively expanding spending to meet human and environmental needs, from funding a transition to renewable energy and climate jobs, expanding social housing, addressing the inequality in schools funding or providing quality healthcare for everyone in need.

The usual arguments about the need to reduce government debt and ensure a balanced budget have been thrown out the window. But all of this is designed as a temporary measure to allow capitalism to return to exploitation as usual.

As Solidarity has shown elsewhere, this is precisely what happened following the stimulus spending during the last crisis in 2009. The Labor government went from spending billions on stimulus measures to budget cuts that slashed spending once the crisis was over.

The same exercise is being prepared this time around. They will again want workers to pay the costs of recovery through cuts and attacks on workplace rights. Morrison has already flagged a raft of new pro-business reforms, saying, “policy frameworks… will need to be reconsidered”.

That means, “Tax and industrial relations reform, deregulation, and fast-tracked infrastructure are back in the mix”, as the Financial Review explained.

Tax cuts for big business, abandoned in the face of opposition in the Senate, are likely to be put back on the table. All this shows the hypocrisy of Morrison’s calls for workers to sacrifice in the face of the coronavirus crisis because “we’re all in it together”.

When the immediate crisis passes, it will be workers that are expected to make all the sacrifices so business can expand profits.

By James Supple

Follow us

Magazine

Solidarity meetings

Latest articles

Read more

Funding public health the alternative to lockdowns

Chip Le Grand’s Lockdown is a fascinating look at the politics of COVID-19, focused on the experience of lockdown in Victoria.

COVID surge exposes government failure on hospitals and aged care

COVID is not going away any time soon. We need to demand governments act to provide the funding needed to allow hospitals and aged care to cope.

Aged care deaths product of Morrison’s criminal boosters and funding failures

Amid the wider chaos over the Omicron wave of the virus, the government failure in aged care stands out as particularly deadly. There have been criminal delays delivering booster shots to some of the country’s most vulnerable people.

Comments

  1. Well done James.
    It’s despairing work though, fighting with one hand tied behind your back, the left hand that’s being tied by the ALP politicians supposedly on “the people’s” side, but aren’t. “Solidarity” seems to be sensibly unimpressed by this tactic. Many (most?) don’t, or worse, censor themselves.
    Of course, further right still we find the truly reactionary neoliberals, the LNP, who have mostly set this regressive agenda and run it for decades, (apart from the Hawke-Keating “Labor Government” which kicked it off plus some small interruptions since then). This will ensure there will be no change of heart post CV-19.
    Today I AGAIN heard the GST being mentioned for “reform”, that word beloved by those who like to dress up regressive politics. Further down the track the sadly (and regularly) deluded populace will realise the GST rise was the prelude to tax cuts for the well-off and corporations, ALREADY being mentioned in that all-too-recognisable “It’s unavoidable so don’t bother trying to swim against the tide” tone used by the “softeners-up” of the media, the “expert” commentators. More regressive tax and less PROgressive tax will be the order of the day.
    All the above normal actions of dyed-in-the-wool neoliberals.
    STILL found, in abundance, (as they say in the Coles ads) on both sides of the parliament.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here